danieldelgadouriarte.com

replay · Volve 2009 / Utah FORGE

  • Volve F-10 MD 3433.0 m 168 rpm 24.6 kN·m WOB 4.4 t ROP 2 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3433.5 m 165 rpm 20.6 kN·m WOB 4.9 t ROP 3 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3433.8 m 190 rpm 17.2 kN·m WOB 5.0 t ROP 2 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3434.1 m 190 rpm 20.5 kN·m WOB 8.5 t ROP 2 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3434.6 m 189 rpm 19.9 kN·m WOB 7.6 t ROP 2 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3548.1 m 139 rpm 19.9 kN·m WOB 3.8 t ROP 2 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3548.5 m 159 rpm 19.9 kN·m WOB 4.2 t ROP 3 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3549.2 m 159 rpm 19.9 kN·m WOB 4.0 t ROP 4 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3550.0 m 161 rpm 19.3 kN·m WOB 4.2 t ROP 4 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 3551.0 m 158 rpm 22.1 kN·m WOB 5.2 t ROP 5 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 4721.2 m 199 rpm 26.7 kN·m WOB 4.6 t ROP 17 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 4726.2 m 193 rpm 31.3 kN·m WOB 5.9 t ROP 25 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 4731.2 m 195 rpm 33.0 kN·m WOB 6.5 t ROP 25 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 4736.2 m 200 rpm 28.5 kN·m WOB 5.5 t ROP 25 m/h
  • Volve F-10 MD 4741.2 m 200 rpm 29.7 kN·m WOB 6.2 t ROP 25 m/h
  • Volve F-15A MD 2855.6 m 172 rpm 31.1 kN·m WOB 3.3 t ROP 3 m/h
  • Volve F-15A MD 2856.4 m 175 rpm 33.1 kN·m WOB 5.9 t ROP 5 m/h
  • Volve F-15A MD 2857.2 m 178 rpm 32.4 kN·m WOB 4.9 t ROP 6 m/h
  • Volve F-15A MD 2857.7 m 179 rpm 30.8 kN·m WOB 5.6 t ROP 3 m/h
  • Volve F-15A MD 2858.5 m 180 rpm 32.9 kN·m WOB 5.6 t ROP 4 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2376.2 m 69 rpm 12.4 kN·m WOB 22.3 t ROP 14 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2379.3 m 69 rpm 12.0 kN·m WOB 22.6 t ROP 15 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2383.1 m 69 rpm 12.1 kN·m WOB 22.8 t ROP 27 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2387.6 m 69 rpm 12.7 kN·m WOB 22.6 t ROP 23 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2391.8 m 68 rpm 12.1 kN·m WOB 22.8 t ROP 18 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2960.9 m 25 rpm 4.6 kN·m WOB 18.6 t ROP 6 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2962.1 m 25 rpm 6.2 kN·m WOB 16.5 t ROP 7 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2962.9 m 69 rpm 18.8 kN·m WOB 0.0 t ROP 0 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2965.5 m 71 rpm 16.3 kN·m WOB 21.4 t ROP 17 m/h
  • FORGE 16A(78)-32 MD 2968.5 m 70 rpm 15.6 kN·m WOB 21.2 t ROP 16 m/h

Daniel Delgado Uriarte

Daniel Delgado Uriarte is a petroleum engineering graduate researcher at Texas A&M University, working on drilling data, geothermal and reservoir simulation, and molecular modelling.

Open to collaboration: research collaborations and joint papers, shared datasets and benchmarks, and research-assistant or internship opportunities in drilling data, geothermal simulation and molecular modelling.

Propose a collaboration CV (PDF) how we could work together

Figure 1. Surface rpm and torque from a recorded hour of drilling on Volve well F-10 (replay, 13 May 2009), drawn along the well's real trajectory. Contains data from the Volve field, Equinor Open Data Licence.

M.S. student in Petroleum Engineering (thesis) · Texas A&M University · graduating August 2027
Graduate researcher with Dr. Roman Shor · College Station, Texas

Now: testing what surface drilling data can and cannot detect downhole, on Volve and Utah FORGE · geothermal simulation with open-DARTS and ML surrogates · abstract submitted to the 52nd Stanford Geothermal Workshop.

e-mail GitHub LinkedIn ORCID CV (PDF) publications

español

Research & projects. Simulations, software and research in progress.
Each project states its current status.

Interactive experiments built on the research data.

Polymers & molecular simulation

Building materials, preparing them for simulation, and studying what moves through them.

  • H₂/CH₄ transport in polyethylene. Molecular dynamics of gas diffusion in amorphous polyethylene, comparing temperature and simulation ensembles. Paper · Code. Published in ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2026.
  • POLYMER-FLOW. Every molecular-dynamics study of a polymer starts by building and equilibrating the material again, and fighting until it reaches the right density. POLYMER-FLOW turns that into one declarative specification (polymer, chain length, number of chains, force field, temperature, pressure and acceptance criteria). It grows and packs the chains, compresses and anneals them, checks density, stationarity and bonds, and returns a LAMMPS data file ready to simulate. Prototype — polyethylene only so far; more polymers and validation against experimental densities pending.
  • Asphaltene-reinforced nanocomposites. Mechanical behaviour of polymer composites with asphaltenes, carbon black and hybrid fillers. Simulation study and manuscript under revision.
  • Gas barriers in nanocomposites. A companion study of how those fillers affect gas diffusion through the polymer matrix. Analysis and validation in progress.
  • PE/PP compatibilization. Exploring asphaltenes as interfacial additives for polyethylene/polypropylene blends, with a focus on adhesion and mechanical response. Research project.

Drilling dynamics, production & well operations

What happens downhole, what the surface can tell us about it, and tools for operating wells.

A column of mud in a well deep pushes on the bottom with 368 bar. If the formation holds of pore pressure, the well is overbalanced by 44 bar.

Change a number: type, use the arrow keys, or drag it sideways. Static mud column only, P = ρ·g·TVD; no circulation, temperature or compressibility. The fracture line assumes 1.75 sg and is there for scale, not from a real well.

  • What can surface drilling data detect downhole? With Dr. Roman Shor: an open benchmark of stick-slip detection from surface torque and rotary speed on public field data from the Volve field (Equinor) and Utah FORGE, using downhole measurements as ground truth. It compares a detector trained only on simulations of the Aarsnes–Shor torsional model, supervised machine learning and a simple torque-variability index. Downhole spectra explain the ceiling they share: much of what downhole tools record as stick-slip at FORGE is high-frequency torsional oscillation, which surface data cannot see. Abstract submitted to the 52nd Stanford Geothermal Workshop (February 2027); journal paper in preparation.
  • Why high-frequency torsional oscillation stays in the BHA. A wave model of the drill string in which the tool joints form a torsional stop band, trapping the dominant modes in the bottom-hole assembly, compared with per-second downhole spectra from Utah FORGE. Analysis in progress; more field data requested.
  • Drilling simulator. A real-time Rust engine and operator interface based on the Mærsk Inspirer and Volve wells, covering string dynamics, hydraulics and well-control scenarios. Prototype.
  • Hydraulic-fracture control with ML. An exploratory study of whether injection controls and available observations can support fracture-geometry control. Feasibility study — data and observability limitations identified.
  • Petroleum Production Systems, rewritten. A modern rewrite of the program that accompanies Economides, Hill, Ehlig-Economides and Zhu's textbook: 63 production-engineering calculations (PVT, inflow performance, wellbore flow, chokes, nodal analysis, well testing, gas lift, fracturing, acidizing, material balance), checked against the original 1997 Fortran program and the book's worked examples. Working software.
  • Pore Pressure Lab. Interactive lessons, a conceptual compaction simulator and log-interpretation exercises covering pore pressure, effective stress and formation-pressure estimation. Educational software.
  • Autowell. A concept for a multiproduct well or well hub whose operating decisions respond to market conditions, including an in-situ hydrogen pathway. Concept study.
Figures: simulator display and field-data inventory
Driller display of the real-time drilling simulator during an influx (kick) scenario with active alarms
The simulator's driller display. Click any image for the full size.
Bar chart of downhole stick-slip sample counts across twelve Volve wellbores (Equinor open data)
September 2026 Volve data inventory, before subsequent evaluation filters.

Enhanced oil recovery, across scales

From molecular interactions to reservoir behaviour.

  • Gas EOR from nanopore to reservoir. Connecting LAMMPS molecular simulations with OPM Flow models to investigate confinement, adsorption and water in CO₂ huff-n-puff. In progress.
  • MOF nanofluids for EOR. Modelling UiO-66 nanoparticles, brine, oil and asphaltene-aged mineral surfaces. Rebuilding the workflow with component validation after auditing the original simulations. Model redevelopment.
Figure: nanopore density profile
Density profiles of shale-oil components within a four-nanometre graphene pore
From the nanopore reproduction study.

CO₂ storage, recovery & project economics

A related set of studies, from reservoir mechanisms to field selection.

  • CO₂ storage in depleted heavy-oil reservoirs. Reservoir simulations of trapping mechanisms and the storage–recovery trade-off. First pass complete; being rerun with a real-gas CO₂ description before any results are reported.
  • CO₂-EOR across crude types. A proposed extension comparing oil recovery and CO₂ storage across the API-gravity spectrum. Research plan.
  • Which real fields are viable for CO₂-EOR? A proposed screening workflow combining public field data, simulation and economics to examine where injection could make sense. Research plan.
  • CCS and low-carbon energy projects. Technical and business studies of storage opportunities, project integration and candidate assets. Exploratory studies.

Geothermal & thermal reservoir simulation

Hot reservoirs where water boils near the well, and how to study them in minutes instead of days.

  • Geothermal simulation with open-DARTS. A pressure–enthalpy model that keeps running where water flashes to steam around the producer. It migrates an ECLIPSE 300 THERMAL model of a 310 °C reservoir to open-DARTS, matching the producer's mass rate within 0.3–0.8 %, and reproduces classic thermal benchmarks: Stanford's 1980 radial boiling problem and the SPE 4 cyclic-steam and steamflood problems. Research in progress.
  • ML surrogates for geothermal studies. Gaussian-process surrogates with active learning, so that a study needs a few dozen simulations rather than hundreds. On NREL's public Brady Hot Springs dataset (101 cases), a PCA + Gaussian-process surrogate reached lower cross-validation error than the published neural network. Training datasets being regenerated after a fluid-property correction; results shown are on public benchmarks.
  • Thermal-study automation. An ECLIPSE deck reader and checker, a deck-to-DARTS translator, an automatic validator and a case factory: the steps that usually take hours of manual editing between simulator runs. Working tools, in development.

Reactive molecular simulation (ReaxFF)

  • H₂S interacting with iron. Reactive molecular simulations using ReaxFF, with temperature-dependent runs and hydrogen-diffusion analysis. Simulation files and results; scientific review pending.

Publications

  1. Delgado Uriarte, D., & Shor, R. J. Stick-slip and HFTO at Utah FORGE: what surface drilling data can and cannot detect. Abstract submitted to the 52nd Stanford Geothermal Workshop, Stanford, CA, February 2027. Submitted.
  2. Delgado-Uriarte, D., & López, A. (2026). Ensemble-dependent diffusivity selectivity in amorphous polyethylene: a statistically validated molecular dynamics study of H₂/CH₄ transport. ACS Applied Polymer Materials. doi:10.1021/acsapm.6c00287 · code Published.
  3. Delgado Uriarte, D. (2023). Device for detection of hydrogen leaks in pipe systems and installations. Spanish utility model ES U202330768, published 7 September 2023. Published.

Cite as Delgado Uriarte, D. (the ACS article spells it Delgado-Uriarte, D.) · ORCID 0009-0006-0536-5158 · how to cite the ACS article

Manuscripts in preparation are listed with their projects above, not here.

Contact & collaboration

I welcome collaboration on related questions, particularly connecting molecular simulation, reservoir modelling and physics–ML tools.

Tell me which project caught your attention, what you are working on, and how we might work together. Questions about the code and research are welcome too.

How we could work together

  • Drilling vibration benchmark. Test a stick-slip or torsional-vibration detector on the same public Volve and Utah FORGE data with downhole ground truth, or share field data with downhole measurements that would extend it. propose this · summary
  • Production engineering software. Use or check the Petroleum Production Systems rewrite (63 calculations, including nodal analysis, checked against the 1997 Fortran program and the textbook's worked examples) in teaching or in a study. propose this
  • Geothermal and thermal simulation. Studies with open-DARTS where water flashes to steam, ECLIPSE-to-DARTS model migration, and Gaussian-process surrogates with active learning so a study needs a few dozen simulations rather than hundreds. propose this · summary
  • Polymer molecular modelling. Gas transport in polymers (published H₂/CH₄ study with public code) and POLYMER-FLOW, a prototype that turns a polymer specification into an equilibrated LAMMPS data file; polyethylene only so far, with other polymers and validation against experimental densities still to do. propose this · summary

danieldelgadouriarte [at] gmail [dot] com

Daniel's laboratory
Ready.

Privacy & measurement

This site measures how it is used at three levels. Everything works the same whatever you choose, and you can change your choice here at any time.

1. Anonymous counts (always on, no permission asked)

Each event is sent on its own, with no ID of any kind: page views (language, the domain of the site that linked here but never the full address, and campaign tags), which projects and sections come into view, which experiments are opened and which controls are changed (not the values), downloads (CV, CSV files), clicks on links to GitHub, LinkedIn, ORCID or the paper DOI, steps towards contact (copying the address or preparing a draft, never the message), loading errors, browser and operating-system family, mobile or desktop screen size, and an approximate country taken from your device's time zone (not from your IP address or location services). The server adds each event to an hourly counter, so events cannot be linked to each other or to you. Nothing is stored on your device for this.

2. Detailed measurement (only if you allow it)

A random ID for this browser tab links your events so the visit can be followed as a path: approximate active time per project and experiment, click positions, scroll depth, steps from projects to the laboratory to contact, and whether you allowed detailed measurement on this browser before. The ID is kept in this tab's session storage and is not your name.

3. Visual replay (separate extra permission)

Replays reconstruct only this webpage, not your screen, other tabs, microphone or camera. Inputs are masked, the notebook and terminal are excluded, and animated canvases are not recorded.

Never collected

Your name, the text of your messages, anything typed in the notebook or terminal, form values, or your IP address (this site's code does not store it). There are no third-party trackers, cookies or advertising.

If you use the contact form, your name, address and message are sent to Daniel by e-mail and are not stored on this website. Measurement only records that a message was sent.

Checking measurement availability…

Detailed events and anonymous counters are kept for 90 days, replays for 14 days. Statistics are only visible to the site owner in a private dashboard. If you allow detailed measurement, that choice is remembered on this device; choosing anonymous counts only removes it.